# Transaction ordering policy

**URL:** <https://research.arbitrum.io/t/transaction-ordering-policy/127>\
**Category:** Uncategorized\
**Created:** [August 30, 2022, 2:56pm UTC](https://research.arbitrum.io/t/transaction-ordering-policy/127 "2022-08-30T14:56:07Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 13

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![zkstonks](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/research.arbitrum.io/zkstonks/32/6203_2.png) [@zkstonks](https://research.arbitrum.io/u/zkstonks)\
**Post date:** [February 25, 2023, 2:57am UTC](https://research.arbitrum.io/t/transaction-ordering-policy/127/13 "2023-02-25T02:57:44Z")

</div>

I’ve posted a thread here about the current discussion on auction formats to minimize load on the sequencer. It is tangentially related to this discussion. [Thoughts on Arbitrum's Proposal to Score Connections by PoW](https://research.arbitrum.io/t/thoughts-on-arbitrums-proposal-to-score-connections-by-pow/8121)

---

_[View the full topic](https://research.arbitrum.io/t/transaction-ordering-policy/127)._
